Noise art
Wow, one post a year. What a lousy blog.
I've found some "interesting" "music" on archive.org called noise art. If you take a listen, you'll understand the quotes. It stretches the definition of music, and most people would find it assaulting/insulting to their aural environment. I know for sure many people who would turn to me after listening and say, "Come on Ted, be serious. You can't actually like this stuff."
I will be serious. So I smirked a little when I heard it first. Ha ha, create a sound that is as unappealing as possible and try to pass it off as music. But then I listened to it with an open mind and was amazed. It is trance-like, a real right brain experience. I felt the same euphoria that I've felt in the presence of a precisely manicured symphonic orchestra, or the unity of a well-trained choir. It was beautiful and intoxicating. And it was cleansing. It opened my mind like the Ives' exercise to sing and play a half step apart. Try it, play Yankee Doodle in C while singing it in D-flat.
So how could noise be beautiful? How is it possible that the polar opposite of historical definition of beauty and consonance can be also found beautiful? Consider the hair of a woman. It swings and falls in a united yet unorganized way. There is something noisy about it. Most people would agree that tying up the hair into a tight, controlled bun would be not so attractive as the free, complicated pattern that it would create if it were loose. A computer animation of hair, or water, or even dust would be insipid without randomness or apparent random elements included.
Random can be beautiful. Noise can be art.
I've found some "interesting" "music" on archive.org called noise art. If you take a listen, you'll understand the quotes. It stretches the definition of music, and most people would find it assaulting/insulting to their aural environment. I know for sure many people who would turn to me after listening and say, "Come on Ted, be serious. You can't actually like this stuff."
I will be serious. So I smirked a little when I heard it first. Ha ha, create a sound that is as unappealing as possible and try to pass it off as music. But then I listened to it with an open mind and was amazed. It is trance-like, a real right brain experience. I felt the same euphoria that I've felt in the presence of a precisely manicured symphonic orchestra, or the unity of a well-trained choir. It was beautiful and intoxicating. And it was cleansing. It opened my mind like the Ives' exercise to sing and play a half step apart. Try it, play Yankee Doodle in C while singing it in D-flat.
So how could noise be beautiful? How is it possible that the polar opposite of historical definition of beauty and consonance can be also found beautiful? Consider the hair of a woman. It swings and falls in a united yet unorganized way. There is something noisy about it. Most people would agree that tying up the hair into a tight, controlled bun would be not so attractive as the free, complicated pattern that it would create if it were loose. A computer animation of hair, or water, or even dust would be insipid without randomness or apparent random elements included.
Random can be beautiful. Noise can be art.
Labels: composition, noise

